.
Feedback

Blog: State Senator Ted Lieu Does Not Do Townhall Meetings?

State Senator Ted Lieu (D-Torrance) does not "do townhall meetings," according to one office staffer. Even though Lieu has new "deferral areas," why does he insist on not talking with his voters?

I have started the steady habit of contacting my representatives over the last few weeks. One Republican Party official told me that I could call like-minded legislators all week, but I would be wasting my breath "preaching to the choir." If I did not contact and comment to my representatives, which I do not like, I might get results. 

Congressman Henry Waxman's staff are quite cordial, as are the staff for Assemblyman Al Muratsuchi and State Senator Ted Lieu.

On Feb. 11, I called Sen. Lieu's office to ask when he would be hosting a townhall meeting. Right away, I was informed that Lieu does not hold townhall meetings.

"He does not represent a town", the secretary reported to me when I asked to know when the state senator would be paying a visit to the South Bay. Since Sen. Lieu does not "represent" a town, he is thus not obliged to hold a "townhall" meeting.

I then explained that Congressman Henry Waxman just visited the Hermosa Beach area a little over a week ago. I then mentioned that Presidential candidates often hold town hall meetings, too. New Jersey Governor Chris Christie is a YouTube star in part because of his frequent visits with his voters. Not afraid to mix it up with constituents, who two-to-one favor his opposition, Christie still commands a high favorability rating with voters.

I was still amazed that my state senator would not be paying a visit any time soon, since Sen. Lieu must know (as should every voter in the South Bay and the Beach Cities) that he has received new "deferral areas" for a new state senate district, a change in venue resulting from the Citizens Redistricting Commission. No longer overseeing Carson and Long Beach, Lieu is now accountable to voters in the Palos Verdes Peninsula all the way to Beverly Hills.

Lucky (or unlucky) for me, Sen. Lieu still represents me, too.

Of course, I understand why Sen. Lieu may be reluctant to meet face to face with his constituents. He has authored one nanny-state interventionist bill after another, often with no regard for the time wasted or the costs accrued, or even the litigation enacted as a result.

Perhaps Lieu does not want to explain why he cares about shark fins instead of our public schools. Instead of supporting school choice and rescinding the "gun free zone" provisions at our public schools, he wants to add more financial burdens to schools which do not have an adequate disaster preparedness plan.

He has pressed for financial transparency from Super PACs. Perhaps he does not want to explain the extensive amount of campaign support that he receives from unions, the same special interests which resist school reform, which oppose pension reform, and which helped kill SB 1530, law which would expedite removing teachers guilty of gross misconduct in the classroom. No wonder he would resist a "right-to-work" law, which would help create jobs and keep money in workers' wallets.

He wanted to triple our car tax, making it harder for working families to keep their wheels on the road. I wonder how he feels about the bullet train boondoggle, too.

Perhaps Lieu does not want voters to realize that he cares more about bears being chased up a tree instead of California businesses being chased out of the state because of high taxes, excessive regulations, and the unending Sacramento spending spree.

Lieu feels entitled to ban tanning for minors, and he feels qualified to ban gay aversion therapy for adolescents, but he has done nothing for the minors who are burning away their future in sub-standard schools, who receive an underfunded college education, who enter an undemanding and unprofitable workforce.

He banned the private sale of pets, but wants to microchip them for their protection. What good is Fido with a tracking device if the master has to eat dog food because he cannot afford anything else?

Sen. Lieu claimed in one post that the State of California has "only" a billion dollar deficit left following the forced passage of Prop 30. Why does he consider any deficit an improvement? Why has he not pressed for less spending and lower taxes all around? Does he really assume that California voters are going to fall for the same creative accounting gimmicks proffered by Governor Brown in his last "State of the State" address.

Twice I demanded to understand why State Sen. Lieu will not be holding a townhall meeting in the South Bay. A perfect venue for him would be the Redondo Beach Main library, since Redondo Beach belongs to his former and his new state senate district. Right in the middle of the clashes over business, economic recovery, environmental regulations (AES, anyone?), and the struggling public school system, Redondo Beach would be a perfect place. Without a doubt, Mayor Mike Gin and his city council would welcome him.

I am sure that Beach Cities and South Bay residents would love to give him more than a piece of their mind. However, apparently Sen. Lieu does not do "townhall" meetings.

Call State Sen. Ted Lieu. Make him change his mind:

Capitol Office
State Capitol, Room 4061
Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: (916) 651-4028
Fax: (916) 323-6056

District Office
2512 Artesia Blvd., #320
Redondo Beach, CA 90278-3279
Phone: (310) 318-6994
Fax: (310) 318-6733

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Redondo Beach Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jeff & Melissa Ginsburg, Steve Aspel and Joan Irvine at our May 14th Election Watch Party
Deborah Shepard May 18, 2013 at 11:32 am
Big congrats to you Jeff. Please fill us in (Crowne Plaza Redondo Beach and Marina Hotel andRead More Visitors Bureau) on the hotel shuttle. Also, how do we get Riviera Village's newest hit, Rock N Brew to be called Redondo Beach vs. Torrance??
Joan Irvine May 16, 2013 at 08:08 am
Jeff, I am so pleased that you will be representing the residents of District 1 for the next fourRead More years.
Deborah Shepard May 18, 2013 at 11:56 am
Congrats to the boys and girls baseball/softball teams, showing the Redondo strength of body andRead More mind! Reading all sorts of good things about your teams! Great going players and coaches from the Crowne Plaza Redondo Beach and Marina Hotel staff!
john May 4, 2013 at 09:18 pm
And here I thought I needed to Drive to San Diego to experience craft breweries and bars. Nice job.
sheri patterson April 30, 2013 at 12:19 am
Mary, I read your posts throughout the Measure A campaign. You may want to re-read your posts whenRead More you cast stones about "dividing a city". There wasn't much substantiation to any of your posts-- mostly just attacks on Jim Light. Do Aspel and Ginsburg condone this sort of behavior since you are such a strong voice for them?
Jim Light April 28, 2013 at 03:41 pm
http://www.prado2013.com/ Voters should read this before casting their ballot. Dianne Prado,Read More former District 1 candidate, exposes the electioneering, intimidation and cronyism of this campaign.
Jim Light April 26, 2013 at 11:16 pm
Perhaps we should just turn our heads and let the City Council violate the law. Is that what youRead More would do Mr H? The City Charter is the law of Redondo. The Council chose knowingly to violate it. When the judge found them in violation, the same Council doubled the costs with a frivolous appeal. This time three judges threw it out. Had the Council followed the Charter, there would be zero costs. If you want to hold anyone accountable, it should be those who cast the vote to violate the City Charter and disenfranchise the voters of Redondo. You should not hold me and the over 200 residents who contributed to the lawsuit to uphold the City Charter responsible for the Council's illegal action.
David Mallen May 6, 2013 at 11:28 pm
We are still waiting for someone -- perhaps the author of this post -- to make a coherent,Read More fact-based argument in favor of Mr. Diels. With all due respect, conclusory hopes and dreams of "reform" will not get 'er done in the face of Mr. Diels' voting record as City Councilman. Thankfully, one good thing has come of the author's blog post. The facts and blog posts have vindicated the honesty and integrity of the campaigns run by Dawn Esser and Chris Cagle, against a baseless attack by Mrs. Diels. If I had a magic mand, I would wave it and change the City Charter so that Dawn and Chris could share the position of Treasurer.
David Mallen May 6, 2013 at 11:17 pm
Mr. Azouz: Thank you. I am glad some neighbors find value in what I do, but more importantly IRead More respect the fact that you take the time to do your own homework. If you have expertise in a particular area that can benefit the City, feel free to contact me off line. That goes for anyone. After the election, I have a "big idea" that I want to promote for our City. When Bill Brand and Steve Aspel both agree that my idea is promising, then I think we are on the right track. I'll be curious to learn what the City Manager has to say.
Rocketgerl May 6, 2013 at 10:51 pm
Correction - that's his email. Jimlightforcouncil.com is more fun! Although I'm sure he'd love toRead More hear from you at either address!
Bryan M_HighlandPark May 5, 2013 at 03:13 am
Good info! I will be attending to see my young nephew in the choir. Glad to know more of theRead More background of the piece!