.
Feedback

Grocery Workers Vote on New Deal

Grocery workers are voting whether to accept a new deal on health-care costs and whether to authorize a strike.

Unionized grocery workers from across Southern California began casting votes Friday on whether to accept the latest health-care proposal from three supermarket changes and whether to authorize a strike, City News Service reported. The vote will continue through Saturday.

  • Previously:

Ralphs, Albertsons and Vons—each of which has at least one location in Redondo Beach—said the latest proposal on the table would keep health-care expenses at current levels and cost workers only $9 per week for single coverage or $23 per week for family coverage.

"The employers' goal throughout these negotiations is to provide their employees with a solid compensation package, including affordable health care, and to also produce an agreement that will enable the companies to compete in Southern California in a difficult economy with aggressive, low-cost competition," the chains said in a statement when the proposal was first put on the table.

Nevertheless, union officials condemned the latest offer. According to officials from the United Food and Commercial Workers Local 770, many grocery workers would have to spend nearly half their salaries to cover health costs.

According to union spokesman Mike Shimpock, the dispute centers on the amount of money the supermarkets put into a health-care trust fund. Payments to the trust fund have decreased over the past decade, and if the employers don't add more money to the fund, it will go bankrupt within about a year, Shimpock said. This would leave thousands of workers without health care.

The union and the grocery chains have yet to reach an agreement on wages, either.

The two sides previously reached an agreement on pensions, but while the supermarkets called the deal , union officials called it "."

Still, both sides have said they want to avoid a walkout.

"Nobody wants to go on strike," union spokesman Mike Shimpock told City News Service. "It'll hurt the market, it'll hurt us ... but we have to draw a line in the sand here and say we need a fair deal.

"This vote is about sending a message to corporations for us and for everybody," he said. "If you work hard, you should be able to support your family."

Meanwhile, the grocery chains told ABC7 that they were making contingency plans just in case a walkout does occur.

"We want to avoid a strike," Ralphs spokeswoman Kendra Doyel said. "The best thing for everyone is to stay at the table and continue negotiating. Our workers want to keep working. Our stores are open and ready for customers, but should something change, we have a plan in place to make sure we can take care of everyone going forward. But we certainly hope that doesn't happen and that we don't have to put things into place."

Results of the vote will probably be available Sunday or Monday. Even if workers vote to authorize a strike, a walkout won't necessarily happen. Union organizers will be authorized to call a strike if negotiations break down.

Union members are currently working under the terms of a contract that expired March 6. That contract was ratified in 2007 after more than six months of negotiations.

During the 2003-2004 strike and lockout, which dragged on for 141, the supermarkets lost about $1.5 billion, and many grocery workers lost their savings.

City News Service contributed to this report.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Redondo Beach Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jeff & Melissa Ginsburg, Steve Aspel and Joan Irvine at our May 14th Election Watch Party
Deborah Shepard May 18, 2013 at 11:32 am
Big congrats to you Jeff. Please fill us in (Crowne Plaza Redondo Beach and Marina Hotel andRead More Visitors Bureau) on the hotel shuttle. Also, how do we get Riviera Village's newest hit, Rock N Brew to be called Redondo Beach vs. Torrance??
Joan Irvine May 16, 2013 at 08:08 am
Jeff, I am so pleased that you will be representing the residents of District 1 for the next fourRead More years.
Deborah Shepard May 18, 2013 at 11:56 am
Congrats to the boys and girls baseball/softball teams, showing the Redondo strength of body andRead More mind! Reading all sorts of good things about your teams! Great going players and coaches from the Crowne Plaza Redondo Beach and Marina Hotel staff!
john May 4, 2013 at 09:18 pm
And here I thought I needed to Drive to San Diego to experience craft breweries and bars. Nice job.
sheri patterson April 30, 2013 at 12:19 am
Mary, I read your posts throughout the Measure A campaign. You may want to re-read your posts whenRead More you cast stones about "dividing a city". There wasn't much substantiation to any of your posts-- mostly just attacks on Jim Light. Do Aspel and Ginsburg condone this sort of behavior since you are such a strong voice for them?
Jim Light April 28, 2013 at 03:41 pm
http://www.prado2013.com/ Voters should read this before casting their ballot. Dianne Prado,Read More former District 1 candidate, exposes the electioneering, intimidation and cronyism of this campaign.
Jim Light April 26, 2013 at 11:16 pm
Perhaps we should just turn our heads and let the City Council violate the law. Is that what youRead More would do Mr H? The City Charter is the law of Redondo. The Council chose knowingly to violate it. When the judge found them in violation, the same Council doubled the costs with a frivolous appeal. This time three judges threw it out. Had the Council followed the Charter, there would be zero costs. If you want to hold anyone accountable, it should be those who cast the vote to violate the City Charter and disenfranchise the voters of Redondo. You should not hold me and the over 200 residents who contributed to the lawsuit to uphold the City Charter responsible for the Council's illegal action.
David Mallen May 6, 2013 at 11:28 pm
We are still waiting for someone -- perhaps the author of this post -- to make a coherent,Read More fact-based argument in favor of Mr. Diels. With all due respect, conclusory hopes and dreams of "reform" will not get 'er done in the face of Mr. Diels' voting record as City Councilman. Thankfully, one good thing has come of the author's blog post. The facts and blog posts have vindicated the honesty and integrity of the campaigns run by Dawn Esser and Chris Cagle, against a baseless attack by Mrs. Diels. If I had a magic mand, I would wave it and change the City Charter so that Dawn and Chris could share the position of Treasurer.
David Mallen May 6, 2013 at 11:17 pm
Mr. Azouz: Thank you. I am glad some neighbors find value in what I do, but more importantly IRead More respect the fact that you take the time to do your own homework. If you have expertise in a particular area that can benefit the City, feel free to contact me off line. That goes for anyone. After the election, I have a "big idea" that I want to promote for our City. When Bill Brand and Steve Aspel both agree that my idea is promising, then I think we are on the right track. I'll be curious to learn what the City Manager has to say.
Rocketgerl May 6, 2013 at 10:51 pm
Correction - that's his email. Jimlightforcouncil.com is more fun! Although I'm sure he'd love toRead More hear from you at either address!