.
Feedback

CPUC Decision Demonstrates AES Redondo Is Not Necessary

CPUC draft direction for new power contracts is easily met by other new power plants in the pipeline.

The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) issued a draft decision on Dec. 21 directing Southern California Edison to issue long term natural gas power plant power procurement contracts for a minimum of 1,000MW and a maximum of 1,200 MW in the Western LA Basin (our part of the grid). This draft decision was made to support replacement of ocean water cooled power plants in the Los Angeles Basin. 

Ocean-cooled power plants at Alamitos, El Segundo, Huntington Beach, and Redondo Beach have provided over 4,900MW of generation capacity.   New State law requires these plants to significantly reduce their use of ocean water cooling.  Each plant has an assigned compliance date.  AES Redondo must comply by December 31st, 2020.  Power companies are pushing the CPUC to issue new long term contracts so they can commit to building new generation capacity to replace the ocean water cooled plant capacity that is needed.

In this decision, the CPUC is stating that the most replacement power they foresee needing from natural gas plants in the Western LA Basin is 1,200MW.  The El Segundo plant is already being rebuilt at 630 MW.  AES has applied to rebuild 939 MW at Huntington Beach. And AES has indicated they intend to rebuild Alamitos at its full 1,900MW capacity. These three plants would far exceed the 1,500 MW maximum set by the CPUC. This determination corroborates other state agency projections and corroborates BBR and independent consultant conclusions that power from AES Redondo is not required for future grid reliability. 

The California Independent Systems Operator (CAISO), who is responsible for grid reliability, projects that 2,400 MW of replacement generation capacity is required.  This is still far below the 3,400+ MW of capacity if El Segundo, Huntington, and Alamitos are rebuilt at the capacities cited above. AES agreed with the CAISO recommendations stating they calculate 2,300MW of replacement power required.  The CPUC agrees as well and assigns this need to renewable energy projects, energy efficiencies and demand response, other distributed generation and finally, between 1,100 and 1200 MW of natural gas power generation.

Of note is that CAISO, AES and CPUC all agree that the power generation requirement goes up if the replacement plants are not at an “effective” location on the grid, though they differ on the exact definition of “effective”. Previous ISO and CPUC documents have deemed El Segundo, Alamitos and Huntington as critical locations. AES Redondo is never mentioned as it is not located where it can address the most likely generation and transmission failures. This data shows that not only is power from Redondo Beach not required, it actually is undesirable because it would drive up the need for more natural gas power due to its poor location on the grid.

Yet another state agency document confirms what we’ve stated all along. We do not need power from this site. Since we don’t need the power, we should not have to suffer the negative health, environmental, economic impacts of this eyesore blighting our waterfront. 

Measure A gets rid of our unneeded power plant and its impacts on our community. Vote Yes on Measure A.

For more info, go to http://aesredondomustgo.blog.com/

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Redondo Beach Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jeff & Melissa Ginsburg, Steve Aspel and Joan Irvine at our May 14th Election Watch Party
Deborah Shepard May 18, 2013 at 11:32 am
Big congrats to you Jeff. Please fill us in (Crowne Plaza Redondo Beach and Marina Hotel andRead More Visitors Bureau) on the hotel shuttle. Also, how do we get Riviera Village's newest hit, Rock N Brew to be called Redondo Beach vs. Torrance??
Joan Irvine May 16, 2013 at 08:08 am
Jeff, I am so pleased that you will be representing the residents of District 1 for the next fourRead More years.
Deborah Shepard May 18, 2013 at 11:56 am
Congrats to the boys and girls baseball/softball teams, showing the Redondo strength of body andRead More mind! Reading all sorts of good things about your teams! Great going players and coaches from the Crowne Plaza Redondo Beach and Marina Hotel staff!
john May 4, 2013 at 09:18 pm
And here I thought I needed to Drive to San Diego to experience craft breweries and bars. Nice job.
sheri patterson April 30, 2013 at 12:19 am
Mary, I read your posts throughout the Measure A campaign. You may want to re-read your posts whenRead More you cast stones about "dividing a city". There wasn't much substantiation to any of your posts-- mostly just attacks on Jim Light. Do Aspel and Ginsburg condone this sort of behavior since you are such a strong voice for them?
Jim Light April 28, 2013 at 03:41 pm
http://www.prado2013.com/ Voters should read this before casting their ballot. Dianne Prado,Read More former District 1 candidate, exposes the electioneering, intimidation and cronyism of this campaign.
Jim Light April 26, 2013 at 11:16 pm
Perhaps we should just turn our heads and let the City Council violate the law. Is that what youRead More would do Mr H? The City Charter is the law of Redondo. The Council chose knowingly to violate it. When the judge found them in violation, the same Council doubled the costs with a frivolous appeal. This time three judges threw it out. Had the Council followed the Charter, there would be zero costs. If you want to hold anyone accountable, it should be those who cast the vote to violate the City Charter and disenfranchise the voters of Redondo. You should not hold me and the over 200 residents who contributed to the lawsuit to uphold the City Charter responsible for the Council's illegal action.
David Mallen May 6, 2013 at 11:28 pm
We are still waiting for someone -- perhaps the author of this post -- to make a coherent,Read More fact-based argument in favor of Mr. Diels. With all due respect, conclusory hopes and dreams of "reform" will not get 'er done in the face of Mr. Diels' voting record as City Councilman. Thankfully, one good thing has come of the author's blog post. The facts and blog posts have vindicated the honesty and integrity of the campaigns run by Dawn Esser and Chris Cagle, against a baseless attack by Mrs. Diels. If I had a magic mand, I would wave it and change the City Charter so that Dawn and Chris could share the position of Treasurer.
David Mallen May 6, 2013 at 11:17 pm
Mr. Azouz: Thank you. I am glad some neighbors find value in what I do, but more importantly IRead More respect the fact that you take the time to do your own homework. If you have expertise in a particular area that can benefit the City, feel free to contact me off line. That goes for anyone. After the election, I have a "big idea" that I want to promote for our City. When Bill Brand and Steve Aspel both agree that my idea is promising, then I think we are on the right track. I'll be curious to learn what the City Manager has to say.
Rocketgerl May 6, 2013 at 10:51 pm
Correction - that's his email. Jimlightforcouncil.com is more fun! Although I'm sure he'd love toRead More hear from you at either address!