.
Feedback

Vote Yes on Proposition 30, League of Women Voters Urges

Harriet Chase, the social policy chair for the League of Women Voters Beach Cities, explains the organization's position on the schools funding ballot proposal.

When people hear that I am a member of the League of Women Voters of California, they always smile and say, “I love how the League analyzes ballot initiatives! I love how they give recommendations on ballot initiatives! I feel like I can trust their recommendations.” 

This November people are being asked to vote on Gov. Jerry Brown’s tax initiative (Proposition 30) and, as always, they ask what the League recommends. They particularly want to know how Prop. 30 will help (or hurt) schools.

The League recommends a YES vote on Prop. 30 because "it begins to move California toward financial stability and adequate funding for all the services we want from our government" (from LWVC website).  

I am voting YES on Prop. 30 because I believe it will help schools now and in the long run. Not only will it help schools, it will help all programs in our state budget because the money it raises will be shared with lots of programs that would be cut otherwise. Programs such as mental health, colleges, child care, public safety and the courts will be helped by Prop. 30. And, traditional public schools will be helped. In fact, if Prop. 30 does not pass, not only will those other services be cut drastically, schools will be cut over $400 per student!  

How would schools manage with a budget where they get $400 less per student? We’ve already heard that many schools would cut their school year by up to 20 days. Twenty days! How can our children get even an adequate education if their school year is 20 days shorter? When we should be investing in education for the world ahead, and our graduates are competing with students from Singapore, Finland and other high-performing educational systems, how is it that we should willingly cut 20 days from our school year?  

You may remember that many months ago there were five tax initiatives being proposed for this November’s election. One of them was the so-called “Millionaire’s Tax.” This tax was going to start raising taxes on people earning more than $250,000 a year, particularly millionaires. This tax polled real well among us non-millionaires, and it was supported by teachers. Why am I giving you this history lesson? Well, Gov. Brown and the backers of the Millionaire’s Tax decided to join forces and combine their initiatives. Now Gov. Brown’s initiative includes this Millionaire’s Tax and also uses his original idea of having everyone share in temporarily raising money for schools, colleges, mental health, child care, public safety, the courts, etc., by having a quarter-cent rise in the state sales tax. Now a well-rounded group of supporters including teachers, school superintendents, colleges, nurses, public safety workers and many, many more are asking that we vote YES on Prop. 30.  

The League of Women Voters of California thinks this shows a sensible shared responsibility and recommends we vote YES on Proposition 30. In fact, LWVC believes so strongly in this measure that we signed the ballot argument. This is the only tax measure the League is recommending on this ballot.  

To see the entire “Vote with the League” list of ballot propositions, please visit beachvoter.org.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Redondo Beach Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jeff & Melissa Ginsburg, Steve Aspel and Joan Irvine at our May 14th Election Watch Party
Deborah Shepard May 18, 2013 at 11:32 am
Big congrats to you Jeff. Please fill us in (Crowne Plaza Redondo Beach and Marina Hotel andRead More Visitors Bureau) on the hotel shuttle. Also, how do we get Riviera Village's newest hit, Rock N Brew to be called Redondo Beach vs. Torrance??
Joan Irvine May 16, 2013 at 08:08 am
Jeff, I am so pleased that you will be representing the residents of District 1 for the next fourRead More years.
Deborah Shepard May 18, 2013 at 11:56 am
Congrats to the boys and girls baseball/softball teams, showing the Redondo strength of body andRead More mind! Reading all sorts of good things about your teams! Great going players and coaches from the Crowne Plaza Redondo Beach and Marina Hotel staff!
john May 4, 2013 at 09:18 pm
And here I thought I needed to Drive to San Diego to experience craft breweries and bars. Nice job.
sheri patterson April 30, 2013 at 12:19 am
Mary, I read your posts throughout the Measure A campaign. You may want to re-read your posts whenRead More you cast stones about "dividing a city". There wasn't much substantiation to any of your posts-- mostly just attacks on Jim Light. Do Aspel and Ginsburg condone this sort of behavior since you are such a strong voice for them?
Jim Light April 28, 2013 at 03:41 pm
http://www.prado2013.com/ Voters should read this before casting their ballot. Dianne Prado,Read More former District 1 candidate, exposes the electioneering, intimidation and cronyism of this campaign.
Jim Light April 26, 2013 at 11:16 pm
Perhaps we should just turn our heads and let the City Council violate the law. Is that what youRead More would do Mr H? The City Charter is the law of Redondo. The Council chose knowingly to violate it. When the judge found them in violation, the same Council doubled the costs with a frivolous appeal. This time three judges threw it out. Had the Council followed the Charter, there would be zero costs. If you want to hold anyone accountable, it should be those who cast the vote to violate the City Charter and disenfranchise the voters of Redondo. You should not hold me and the over 200 residents who contributed to the lawsuit to uphold the City Charter responsible for the Council's illegal action.
David Mallen May 6, 2013 at 11:28 pm
We are still waiting for someone -- perhaps the author of this post -- to make a coherent,Read More fact-based argument in favor of Mr. Diels. With all due respect, conclusory hopes and dreams of "reform" will not get 'er done in the face of Mr. Diels' voting record as City Councilman. Thankfully, one good thing has come of the author's blog post. The facts and blog posts have vindicated the honesty and integrity of the campaigns run by Dawn Esser and Chris Cagle, against a baseless attack by Mrs. Diels. If I had a magic mand, I would wave it and change the City Charter so that Dawn and Chris could share the position of Treasurer.
David Mallen May 6, 2013 at 11:17 pm
Mr. Azouz: Thank you. I am glad some neighbors find value in what I do, but more importantly IRead More respect the fact that you take the time to do your own homework. If you have expertise in a particular area that can benefit the City, feel free to contact me off line. That goes for anyone. After the election, I have a "big idea" that I want to promote for our City. When Bill Brand and Steve Aspel both agree that my idea is promising, then I think we are on the right track. I'll be curious to learn what the City Manager has to say.
Rocketgerl May 6, 2013 at 10:51 pm
Correction - that's his email. Jimlightforcouncil.com is more fun! Although I'm sure he'd love toRead More hear from you at either address!
Bryan M_HighlandPark May 5, 2013 at 03:13 am
Good info! I will be attending to see my young nephew in the choir. Glad to know more of theRead More background of the piece!