.
Feedback

3 Tax Measures Qualify for November Ballot

Three rival tax increase initiatives have qualified for the state ballot in November.

Rival tax increase initiatives backed by Gov. Jerry Brown and attorney Molly Munger have qualified for the November ballot, along with an initiative that would change the way multistate businesses calculate how much income taxes they owe, Secretary of State Debra Bowen announced Wednesday.

Brown's measure would increase the sales tax by a quarter-cent on the dollar and raise the income tax on annual earnings over $250,000 for seven years. Eighty-nine percent of the revenues from the measure would be devoted to schools from kindergarten through 12th grade and the other 11 percent to community colleges.

The initiative would also guarantee funding for public safety services realigned from state to local governments.

The measure would generate from $6.8 billion to $9 billon for the 2012- 2013 fiscal year, an average of $5.4 billion to $7.6 billion in the following five fiscal years and lesser amounts in the 2018-2019 fiscal year, according to an estimate from the Legislative Analyst's Office and Director of Finance Ana J. Matosantos.

Brown has called the initiative "modest, fair and temporary."

"It won't solve all of the state's problems, but it will help dig us out of a deep hole and protect our schools until the recovery is complete," Brown said May 14 as he presented his revised state budget proposal.

John Kabateck, executive director of the National Federation of Independent Business/California, said the initiative's "huge tax increases will destroy our small businesses and cost us jobs."

"This measure simply gives the politicians in Sacramento more tax money to spend on pet projects, like pensions and the high speed train to nowhere," Kabateck said.

Munger's measure would increase personal income tax rates for annual earnings over $7,316 using a sliding scale from 0.4 percent for the lowest individual earners to 2.2 percent for individual earning more than $2.5 million.

During the first four years, 60 percent of revenues would go to schools from kindergarten through 12th grade, 30 percent to repaying state debt and 10 percent to early childhood programs. Thereafter, 85 percent of revenues would go to schools from kindergarten through 12th grade and 15 percent to early childhood programs.

The measure would generate about $5 billion to $5.5 billion in the 2012- 2013 fiscal year and $10 billion to $11 billon per fiscal year, beginning in the 2013-2014 fiscal year, tending to increase over time, according to an estimate from the Legislative Analyst's Office and Matosantos.

The third initiative would require multistate businesses to calculate their California income tax liability based on the percentage of their sales in California.

Projects that create energy efficiency and clean energy jobs would receive $550 million in each of the first five years the law would be in effect.

The measure would generate $500 million in the 2012-2013 fiscal year and $1 billion in each fiscal year beginning in the 2013-2014 fiscal year, according to an estimate from the Legislative Analyst's Office and Matosantos.

The three initiatives that qualified for the ballot today increase the number of measures on the November ballot to 11. The others are:

  • an $11.1 billion bond measure to upgrade California's water system;
  • a ban on the government deducting union dues from government employee paychecks that would be used for political purposes;
  • a proposal to replace the death penalty with life imprisonment without the possibility of parole;
  • a plan to allow auto insurance rates to be based on a person's history of coverage; and
  • a referendum on the state Senate redistricting plan;
  • a loosening of the three-strikes law;
  • an increase to penalties for human trafficking; and
  • a requirement to label genetically engineered foods.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Redondo Beach Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jeff & Melissa Ginsburg, Steve Aspel and Joan Irvine at our May 14th Election Watch Party
Deborah Shepard May 18, 2013 at 11:32 am
Big congrats to you Jeff. Please fill us in (Crowne Plaza Redondo Beach and Marina Hotel andRead More Visitors Bureau) on the hotel shuttle. Also, how do we get Riviera Village's newest hit, Rock N Brew to be called Redondo Beach vs. Torrance??
Joan Irvine May 16, 2013 at 08:08 am
Jeff, I am so pleased that you will be representing the residents of District 1 for the next fourRead More years.
Deborah Shepard May 18, 2013 at 11:56 am
Congrats to the boys and girls baseball/softball teams, showing the Redondo strength of body andRead More mind! Reading all sorts of good things about your teams! Great going players and coaches from the Crowne Plaza Redondo Beach and Marina Hotel staff!
john May 4, 2013 at 09:18 pm
And here I thought I needed to Drive to San Diego to experience craft breweries and bars. Nice job.
sheri patterson April 30, 2013 at 12:19 am
Mary, I read your posts throughout the Measure A campaign. You may want to re-read your posts whenRead More you cast stones about "dividing a city". There wasn't much substantiation to any of your posts-- mostly just attacks on Jim Light. Do Aspel and Ginsburg condone this sort of behavior since you are such a strong voice for them?
Jim Light April 28, 2013 at 03:41 pm
http://www.prado2013.com/ Voters should read this before casting their ballot. Dianne Prado,Read More former District 1 candidate, exposes the electioneering, intimidation and cronyism of this campaign.
Jim Light April 26, 2013 at 11:16 pm
Perhaps we should just turn our heads and let the City Council violate the law. Is that what youRead More would do Mr H? The City Charter is the law of Redondo. The Council chose knowingly to violate it. When the judge found them in violation, the same Council doubled the costs with a frivolous appeal. This time three judges threw it out. Had the Council followed the Charter, there would be zero costs. If you want to hold anyone accountable, it should be those who cast the vote to violate the City Charter and disenfranchise the voters of Redondo. You should not hold me and the over 200 residents who contributed to the lawsuit to uphold the City Charter responsible for the Council's illegal action.
David Mallen May 6, 2013 at 11:28 pm
We are still waiting for someone -- perhaps the author of this post -- to make a coherent,Read More fact-based argument in favor of Mr. Diels. With all due respect, conclusory hopes and dreams of "reform" will not get 'er done in the face of Mr. Diels' voting record as City Councilman. Thankfully, one good thing has come of the author's blog post. The facts and blog posts have vindicated the honesty and integrity of the campaigns run by Dawn Esser and Chris Cagle, against a baseless attack by Mrs. Diels. If I had a magic mand, I would wave it and change the City Charter so that Dawn and Chris could share the position of Treasurer.
David Mallen May 6, 2013 at 11:17 pm
Mr. Azouz: Thank you. I am glad some neighbors find value in what I do, but more importantly IRead More respect the fact that you take the time to do your own homework. If you have expertise in a particular area that can benefit the City, feel free to contact me off line. That goes for anyone. After the election, I have a "big idea" that I want to promote for our City. When Bill Brand and Steve Aspel both agree that my idea is promising, then I think we are on the right track. I'll be curious to learn what the City Manager has to say.
Rocketgerl May 6, 2013 at 10:51 pm
Correction - that's his email. Jimlightforcouncil.com is more fun! Although I'm sure he'd love toRead More hear from you at either address!