.
Feedback

AES Redondo to Headline Council Meeting

The Redondo Beach City Council will hear a presentation from the California Coastal Conservancy and consider whether to oppose the repowering of AES Redondo Beach.

A large crowd is expected to gather at city hall Tuesday night as the Redondo Beach City Council will dedicate the majority of its meeting to the proposed repowering of in South Redondo Beach.

On the agenda are a presentation from a representative of the California Coastal Conservancy and a discussion on whether the council should pass a resolution opposing the construction of a new power plant.

According to Councilman Bill Brand, the representative of the Coastal Conservancy will discuss large park projects—such as one proposed by power plant opponents—along the California coast.

The current AES plant on Harbor Drive must be retired by 2020 due to a state ban on once-through cooling, where a plant uses ocean water to cool the superheated steam that powers the turbine, then pumps the ocean water back into the sea.

AES intends to apply for a permit from the California Energy Commission this summer to build a new power plant on its property near the waterfront. Company officials maintain that the new plant will be smaller, more efficient and provide electricity when it's not available from renewable resources.

Opponents of the plant, including slow-growth group Building a Better Redondo and political action committee No Power Plant, counter that a new power plant would run more often and thus pollute more, endangering the health of nearby residents, and continue to depress property values in the area.

Power plant opponents have also written an initiative that, if approved by voters, would re-zone the property for up to 40 percent commercial and institutional uses and 60 percent parkland. Power generation would not be an allowable use after 2020 under the initiative.

Redondo Beach City Councilman Bill Brand and BBR leader Jim Light submitted the final text of the initiative to the city on July 3. City staff are in the middle of the 15-day period where they must write a title and summary of the initiative. Once those are written, opponents of the power plant can begin gathering signatures.

According to an email from Brand to constituents, the signatures of about 9,000 registered voters in the city must be collected within a few months for the measure to qualify for the March 2013 ballot.

At the same time, AES has launched a public-relations campaign in support of a new power plant. A large mailer with an included postcard was recently sent to about 10,000 residents in Redondo Beach. The mailer contained information about the proposed plant, including renderings of what it would look like, as well as statistics from various environmental and air quality agencies.

"Our attempt was to get the facts out to the community, to get folks some information so when they're faced with the fanatic opposition, they can make their own educated opinion about what is hype," AES Southland project manager Jennifer Didlo told the Daily Breeze.

Didlo also said AES has received mostly positive feedback.

Editor's note: Redondo Beach Patch will once again be live-blogging the portions of the council meeting relating to the power plant. Check back later for a link.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Redondo Beach Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jeff & Melissa Ginsburg, Steve Aspel and Joan Irvine at our May 14th Election Watch Party
Deborah Shepard May 18, 2013 at 11:32 am
Big congrats to you Jeff. Please fill us in (Crowne Plaza Redondo Beach and Marina Hotel andRead More Visitors Bureau) on the hotel shuttle. Also, how do we get Riviera Village's newest hit, Rock N Brew to be called Redondo Beach vs. Torrance??
Joan Irvine May 16, 2013 at 08:08 am
Jeff, I am so pleased that you will be representing the residents of District 1 for the next fourRead More years.
Deborah Shepard May 18, 2013 at 11:56 am
Congrats to the boys and girls baseball/softball teams, showing the Redondo strength of body andRead More mind! Reading all sorts of good things about your teams! Great going players and coaches from the Crowne Plaza Redondo Beach and Marina Hotel staff!
john May 4, 2013 at 09:18 pm
And here I thought I needed to Drive to San Diego to experience craft breweries and bars. Nice job.
sheri patterson April 30, 2013 at 12:19 am
Mary, I read your posts throughout the Measure A campaign. You may want to re-read your posts whenRead More you cast stones about "dividing a city". There wasn't much substantiation to any of your posts-- mostly just attacks on Jim Light. Do Aspel and Ginsburg condone this sort of behavior since you are such a strong voice for them?
Jim Light April 28, 2013 at 03:41 pm
http://www.prado2013.com/ Voters should read this before casting their ballot. Dianne Prado,Read More former District 1 candidate, exposes the electioneering, intimidation and cronyism of this campaign.
Jim Light April 26, 2013 at 11:16 pm
Perhaps we should just turn our heads and let the City Council violate the law. Is that what youRead More would do Mr H? The City Charter is the law of Redondo. The Council chose knowingly to violate it. When the judge found them in violation, the same Council doubled the costs with a frivolous appeal. This time three judges threw it out. Had the Council followed the Charter, there would be zero costs. If you want to hold anyone accountable, it should be those who cast the vote to violate the City Charter and disenfranchise the voters of Redondo. You should not hold me and the over 200 residents who contributed to the lawsuit to uphold the City Charter responsible for the Council's illegal action.
David Mallen May 6, 2013 at 11:28 pm
We are still waiting for someone -- perhaps the author of this post -- to make a coherent,Read More fact-based argument in favor of Mr. Diels. With all due respect, conclusory hopes and dreams of "reform" will not get 'er done in the face of Mr. Diels' voting record as City Councilman. Thankfully, one good thing has come of the author's blog post. The facts and blog posts have vindicated the honesty and integrity of the campaigns run by Dawn Esser and Chris Cagle, against a baseless attack by Mrs. Diels. If I had a magic mand, I would wave it and change the City Charter so that Dawn and Chris could share the position of Treasurer.
David Mallen May 6, 2013 at 11:17 pm
Mr. Azouz: Thank you. I am glad some neighbors find value in what I do, but more importantly IRead More respect the fact that you take the time to do your own homework. If you have expertise in a particular area that can benefit the City, feel free to contact me off line. That goes for anyone. After the election, I have a "big idea" that I want to promote for our City. When Bill Brand and Steve Aspel both agree that my idea is promising, then I think we are on the right track. I'll be curious to learn what the City Manager has to say.
Rocketgerl May 6, 2013 at 10:51 pm
Correction - that's his email. Jimlightforcouncil.com is more fun! Although I'm sure he'd love toRead More hear from you at either address!