.
Feedback

Opponents Ready to Repeal SB 202

A new law limiting statewide initiatives and referendums to general or special elections is challenged.

Backers of an attempt to overturn a new law that would limit statewide initiative and referendums to November general elections or special elections were given approval Monday to begin gathering signatures by Secretary of State Debra Bowen.

Valid signatures from 504,760 registered voters—5 percent of the total votes cast for governor in the 2010 general election—must be submitted by Jan. 5 to qualify the referendum for the ballot.

Opponents have said Senate Bill 202 curbs the public's right to participate in the initiative process. The way it passed the Legislature—through a process known as gut-and-amend—also drew criticism.

"SB 202 exemplifies the evils of end-of-session gut-and-amends," Sen. Doug LaMalfa, R-Richvale, said hours following its passage on a party-line vote, with no Republicans voting in its favor.

The gut-and-amend process involves a legislator deleting the text of a bill that already exists and replacing it with something new. In this case, SB 202's language about voter initiative filing fees was overwritten.

The Sacramento Bee said the proposal, which the Legislature passed hours before the Sept. 10 legislative deadline, was "highly political" and would "change the state's election laws in ways that will favor Democrats in 2012."

"This bill, which was amended into a completely different bill yesterday, did not receive a committee hearing and it was not subject to adequate public discussion before it was passed late tonight," LaMalfa said. "This bill makes a mockery of the legislative process.

"I think the Legislature is very aware of how unpopular stripping direct democracy rights from the people is. That is why this bill was passed at 1 a.m., after the press has returned to their offices to meet their deadlines."

Sen. Ted Lieu, a Democrat whose district includes Redondo Beach, voted in favor of the bill, but added that he was "absolutely not happy about" his vote, according to the Sacramento Bee.

"The lack of process in this bill is inexcusable," Lieu said before the vote. "We as Democrats should be ashamed at how this came to the Senate floor."

Sen. Lori Hancock, D-Oakland, the bill's author, called it "simply good government."

"Ballot initiatives have a tremendous impact on the lives of Californians," Hancock said Oct. 7, following Gov. Jerry Brown's signing of SB 202. "They should be voted on by the largest number of possible voters."

In his signing message, Brown wrote:

"[T]his measure restores the original understanding of constitutional law that initiatives were to be considered at a general election or at a special election called for critical questions requiring swift resolution by the people. This was the historic practice for more than [50] years. It was not until 1970 that initiatives were first placed on a primary ballot, and that practice has continued ever since…

"The idea of direct democracy is to involve as many voters as possible. This bill accomplishes that objective."

The version of SB 202 signed into law also included a proposal to move the date when voters would be asked to approve changes to the state's rainy-day fund. In his signing message, Brown noted that he also approved of this part of the bill, saying "families can't put money into a savings account when they can't pay their bills, and neither should the state. This needed reform must wait until we have recovered from the current recession and securely balanced our budget."

—City News Service contributed to this report.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Redondo Beach Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jeff & Melissa Ginsburg, Steve Aspel and Joan Irvine at our May 14th Election Watch Party
Deborah Shepard May 18, 2013 at 11:32 am
Big congrats to you Jeff. Please fill us in (Crowne Plaza Redondo Beach and Marina Hotel andRead More Visitors Bureau) on the hotel shuttle. Also, how do we get Riviera Village's newest hit, Rock N Brew to be called Redondo Beach vs. Torrance??
Joan Irvine May 16, 2013 at 08:08 am
Jeff, I am so pleased that you will be representing the residents of District 1 for the next fourRead More years.
Deborah Shepard May 18, 2013 at 11:56 am
Congrats to the boys and girls baseball/softball teams, showing the Redondo strength of body andRead More mind! Reading all sorts of good things about your teams! Great going players and coaches from the Crowne Plaza Redondo Beach and Marina Hotel staff!
john May 4, 2013 at 09:18 pm
And here I thought I needed to Drive to San Diego to experience craft breweries and bars. Nice job.
sheri patterson April 30, 2013 at 12:19 am
Mary, I read your posts throughout the Measure A campaign. You may want to re-read your posts whenRead More you cast stones about "dividing a city". There wasn't much substantiation to any of your posts-- mostly just attacks on Jim Light. Do Aspel and Ginsburg condone this sort of behavior since you are such a strong voice for them?
Jim Light April 28, 2013 at 03:41 pm
http://www.prado2013.com/ Voters should read this before casting their ballot. Dianne Prado,Read More former District 1 candidate, exposes the electioneering, intimidation and cronyism of this campaign.
Jim Light April 26, 2013 at 11:16 pm
Perhaps we should just turn our heads and let the City Council violate the law. Is that what youRead More would do Mr H? The City Charter is the law of Redondo. The Council chose knowingly to violate it. When the judge found them in violation, the same Council doubled the costs with a frivolous appeal. This time three judges threw it out. Had the Council followed the Charter, there would be zero costs. If you want to hold anyone accountable, it should be those who cast the vote to violate the City Charter and disenfranchise the voters of Redondo. You should not hold me and the over 200 residents who contributed to the lawsuit to uphold the City Charter responsible for the Council's illegal action.
David Mallen May 6, 2013 at 11:28 pm
We are still waiting for someone -- perhaps the author of this post -- to make a coherent,Read More fact-based argument in favor of Mr. Diels. With all due respect, conclusory hopes and dreams of "reform" will not get 'er done in the face of Mr. Diels' voting record as City Councilman. Thankfully, one good thing has come of the author's blog post. The facts and blog posts have vindicated the honesty and integrity of the campaigns run by Dawn Esser and Chris Cagle, against a baseless attack by Mrs. Diels. If I had a magic mand, I would wave it and change the City Charter so that Dawn and Chris could share the position of Treasurer.
David Mallen May 6, 2013 at 11:17 pm
Mr. Azouz: Thank you. I am glad some neighbors find value in what I do, but more importantly IRead More respect the fact that you take the time to do your own homework. If you have expertise in a particular area that can benefit the City, feel free to contact me off line. That goes for anyone. After the election, I have a "big idea" that I want to promote for our City. When Bill Brand and Steve Aspel both agree that my idea is promising, then I think we are on the right track. I'll be curious to learn what the City Manager has to say.
Rocketgerl May 6, 2013 at 10:51 pm
Correction - that's his email. Jimlightforcouncil.com is more fun! Although I'm sure he'd love toRead More hear from you at either address!
Bryan M_HighlandPark May 5, 2013 at 03:13 am
Good info! I will be attending to see my young nephew in the choir. Glad to know more of theRead More background of the piece!