.
Feedback

Pharmacist Urges Support of SB1195

SB 1195 would prevent large pharmacy benefit management companies from taking advantage of independent pharmacists, writes Redondo Beach pharmacist Odette Leonelli.

Small, independent pharmacies like mine have survived many economic downturns—including the Great Recession—and have adapted to technology and the changing needs of our customers. But we face a formidable foe in the large pharmacy benefit management companies (PBMs) that manage prescription drug benefits for more than 215 million Americans. PBMs manage prescription insurance claims, and pharmacies of all sizes must enter into contracts with them in order to serve patients.

This arrangement is workable so long as there is a level playing field. But the large PBMs are increasingly bullying the mom-and-pop operations to secure larger profits for themselves.

Audits are a major problem area. Audits of pharmacy claims are, of course, a good business practice and necessary to fight fraud. We fully support the process—but it is a problem when audits are used by the large PBMs to bully a small firm out of legitimate profits.

Right now, there are no uniform auditing standards, so pharmacies are subject to whatever “rules” a PBM sets up. Because the PBMs keep the money they recover from a denied claim, they have a strong financial incentive to deny every claim.

Additionally, they frequently pay auditors based on a commission structure, adding an additional incentive to invalidate prescriptions for technical, non-substantive, and typographical errors.

This game of “gotcha” played by the PBMs encourages auditors to start with the assumption that all claims should be invalidated. Then, they search for technicalities to use as a basis for denying claims in every audit.

As a result of abusive audits, pharmacies are required to spend excessive amounts of time documenting each pharmacy claim and surviving the audits.  This is time that would be much better spent on patient counseling and care.

To make matters worse, if an auditor finds that a prescription I dispensed was not done according to the rules set forth by the PBM, I am required to pay the PBM for the entire cost of the drug—not just the profit we make from dispensing the drug. I was recently audited by a PBM and was required to pay back $629 for a drug that I dispensed. The reason? I misspelled the name of the prescribing physician. My margin on this one transaction was only $23, yet I was required to pay back $629 to the PBM.

We have no power to appeal these decisions or to force the PBMs to play fair.

So, for relief, we are asking our state legislators to support state Sen. Curren Price’s bill to establish fair standards for pharmacy audits and prevent claims from being denied based on minor technicalities. SB1195 maintains the right of a PBM to audit the claims of pharmacies to identify fraud and invalid prescriptions, but takes away the incentive for the PBMs to deny as many claims as possible. It brings fairness to the audit process.

This legislation is pro-small business, pro-patient, and will not cost taxpayers a dime. It deserves the full support of the Legislature.

Odette Leonelli is the owner and Pharmacist in Charge of in Redondo Beach.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Redondo Beach Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jeff & Melissa Ginsburg, Steve Aspel and Joan Irvine at our May 14th Election Watch Party
Deborah Shepard May 18, 2013 at 11:32 am
Big congrats to you Jeff. Please fill us in (Crowne Plaza Redondo Beach and Marina Hotel andRead More Visitors Bureau) on the hotel shuttle. Also, how do we get Riviera Village's newest hit, Rock N Brew to be called Redondo Beach vs. Torrance??
Joan Irvine May 16, 2013 at 08:08 am
Jeff, I am so pleased that you will be representing the residents of District 1 for the next fourRead More years.
Deborah Shepard May 18, 2013 at 11:56 am
Congrats to the boys and girls baseball/softball teams, showing the Redondo strength of body andRead More mind! Reading all sorts of good things about your teams! Great going players and coaches from the Crowne Plaza Redondo Beach and Marina Hotel staff!
john May 4, 2013 at 09:18 pm
And here I thought I needed to Drive to San Diego to experience craft breweries and bars. Nice job.
sheri patterson April 30, 2013 at 12:19 am
Mary, I read your posts throughout the Measure A campaign. You may want to re-read your posts whenRead More you cast stones about "dividing a city". There wasn't much substantiation to any of your posts-- mostly just attacks on Jim Light. Do Aspel and Ginsburg condone this sort of behavior since you are such a strong voice for them?
Jim Light April 28, 2013 at 03:41 pm
http://www.prado2013.com/ Voters should read this before casting their ballot. Dianne Prado,Read More former District 1 candidate, exposes the electioneering, intimidation and cronyism of this campaign.
Jim Light April 26, 2013 at 11:16 pm
Perhaps we should just turn our heads and let the City Council violate the law. Is that what youRead More would do Mr H? The City Charter is the law of Redondo. The Council chose knowingly to violate it. When the judge found them in violation, the same Council doubled the costs with a frivolous appeal. This time three judges threw it out. Had the Council followed the Charter, there would be zero costs. If you want to hold anyone accountable, it should be those who cast the vote to violate the City Charter and disenfranchise the voters of Redondo. You should not hold me and the over 200 residents who contributed to the lawsuit to uphold the City Charter responsible for the Council's illegal action.
David Mallen May 6, 2013 at 11:28 pm
We are still waiting for someone -- perhaps the author of this post -- to make a coherent,Read More fact-based argument in favor of Mr. Diels. With all due respect, conclusory hopes and dreams of "reform" will not get 'er done in the face of Mr. Diels' voting record as City Councilman. Thankfully, one good thing has come of the author's blog post. The facts and blog posts have vindicated the honesty and integrity of the campaigns run by Dawn Esser and Chris Cagle, against a baseless attack by Mrs. Diels. If I had a magic mand, I would wave it and change the City Charter so that Dawn and Chris could share the position of Treasurer.
David Mallen May 6, 2013 at 11:17 pm
Mr. Azouz: Thank you. I am glad some neighbors find value in what I do, but more importantly IRead More respect the fact that you take the time to do your own homework. If you have expertise in a particular area that can benefit the City, feel free to contact me off line. That goes for anyone. After the election, I have a "big idea" that I want to promote for our City. When Bill Brand and Steve Aspel both agree that my idea is promising, then I think we are on the right track. I'll be curious to learn what the City Manager has to say.
Rocketgerl May 6, 2013 at 10:51 pm
Correction - that's his email. Jimlightforcouncil.com is more fun! Although I'm sure he'd love toRead More hear from you at either address!
Rob April 29, 2013 at 03:17 am
ANYONE who will vote in Redondo Beach election MUST read the link below written by Dianne Prado.Read More Jim Light is the right person for District #1! http://www.prado2013.com/the-dirty-down-low-of-redondo-beach-politics/
Joan Irvine April 22, 2013 at 01:13 pm
Hi Rob! I of course respect you have your own opinions but I think you may want to check about theRead More facts. You can clarify this with Kim Fine directly rather than taking my word for it; her contact information is available on her campaign website: http://www.kimberlyfine.com. I'd appreciate if you would post her response, so everyone will have the correct information. Thanks
Joan Irvine April 22, 2013 at 11:00 am
Mary, I agree with your statement: 'While everyone has a right to their own opinion, all in DistrictRead More One should investigate both candidates recent and past history." And anyone who know that Jeff Ginsburg is my choice for this Council seat.