.
Feedback

New Storm Water Runoff Rules Could Be Costly for South Bay Cities

The new Regional Water Board regulations could end up costing South Bay cities millions of dollars in the coming years.

Editor's Note: This article was updated on Friday, Nov. 16 with comment from the city of Rancho Palos Verdes.

New storm water runoff regulations passed by the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board last week have many municipalities in Los Angeles County considering their options as the new costs associated with compliance could reach into the millions for some cities.

According to the water board, the new regulations are designed to reduce the amount of trash, metals, bacteria, chemicals and pesticides that wash from storm drains into local waterways and cause beach closings, contaminated fish and trash accumulation, among other things.

The new regulations update and renew previous mandates that were passed in 2001 that failed to reach the water quality improvement goals that the board hoped for, the Los Angeles Times reported.

"Clean water is vitally important for our health and for the environment,” Regional Water Board Executive Officer Samuel Unger said in a release. “The new regulations are designed to give municipalities the flexibility to design a strategy that meets clean water goals in the most cost effective way.”

However, some South Bay municipalities said that the new permit requirements are going to entail additional costs and are already planning to challenge the new mandates.

Last week, the Redondo Beach City Council unanimously approved a motion to file an administrative petition with the State Water Resources Control Board challenging the new permit regulations. Of the other issues the city has with the new permit is that the new mandates lack funding.

According to staff reports, costs related to storm water-related maintenance and operations expenses in Redondo Beach will increase by up to $200,000 per year. In addition, the new regulations will require the city to spend approximately $19 million in additional capital expenditure over the next 10 years.

According to the Los Angeles Times, unless Los Angeles County voters approve a new parcel tax that is being prepared by the county flood control district, these new requirements have no current source of funding.

“We are talking about adding what amounts to a couple million dollars a year for the next 10 years of additional costs to the city with no funding mechanism," Redondo Beach Councilman Matt Kilroy said at the Nov. 6 council meeting. "We have found that if we don't challenge permit regulations now, then we lose all ability to do so in the future." 

Additionally, the City of Redondo Beach took issue with the fact that the city would be held responsible for pollution that originated outside the city's border and outside its control.

“In many cases, the cause and/or remedy of the water quality problem are unknown," a staff report stated. "Other agencies such as Caltrans, schools, state agencies, and other contributors such as air deposition, wildlife, etc. could foreseeably be responsible for certain water quality problems but are not under the control of the municipal permittee."

Just up the road, the City of Hermosa Beach is also looking into the new requirements and their ramifications but has not yet taken any action, according to Public Works Director Frank Senteno.

"Exactly how it is going to affect the city, we still don't know that yet because we still need to analyze (the permit) and break it down," Senteno said. "There are many components to the permit." 

But, Senteno did say the new requirements will come at a price.

"Without a doubt... They will increase cost to the city," Senteno said.

Rancho Palos Verdes on the Palos Verdes Peninsula is taking a similar course of action to Hermosa Beach and will analyze the new requirements before making a move.

According to Andy Winje, a city engineer with RPV, the new permit contains about 400 more pages than the previous permit, all of which need to be studied.

"It has become that much more complex," said Winje. "It is a tough challenge and we all want clean water but how clean is clean enough and how much do we want to spend to get there," he said.

"It will certainly increase costs because there are increased costs for monitoring and reporting at the very least," Winje continued. "We don't expect costs to come down at all."

Cities that do decide to file a petition challenging the new permit must do so by December 8.

If cities do choose to file a petition with the state water board, legal costs typically amount to around $25,000, according to the Redondo Beach staff report. However, as the staff report pointed out, the legal costs can be shared with other cities looking to file the same petition.

Other cities in the area that may consider challenging the new permit include Lawndale, Carson and Lomita, according to the report.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Redondo Beach Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jeff & Melissa Ginsburg, Steve Aspel and Joan Irvine at our May 14th Election Watch Party
Deborah Shepard May 18, 2013 at 11:32 am
Big congrats to you Jeff. Please fill us in (Crowne Plaza Redondo Beach and Marina Hotel andRead More Visitors Bureau) on the hotel shuttle. Also, how do we get Riviera Village's newest hit, Rock N Brew to be called Redondo Beach vs. Torrance??
Joan Irvine May 16, 2013 at 08:08 am
Jeff, I am so pleased that you will be representing the residents of District 1 for the next fourRead More years.
Deborah Shepard May 18, 2013 at 11:56 am
Congrats to the boys and girls baseball/softball teams, showing the Redondo strength of body andRead More mind! Reading all sorts of good things about your teams! Great going players and coaches from the Crowne Plaza Redondo Beach and Marina Hotel staff!
john May 4, 2013 at 09:18 pm
And here I thought I needed to Drive to San Diego to experience craft breweries and bars. Nice job.
sheri patterson April 30, 2013 at 12:19 am
Mary, I read your posts throughout the Measure A campaign. You may want to re-read your posts whenRead More you cast stones about "dividing a city". There wasn't much substantiation to any of your posts-- mostly just attacks on Jim Light. Do Aspel and Ginsburg condone this sort of behavior since you are such a strong voice for them?
Jim Light April 28, 2013 at 03:41 pm
http://www.prado2013.com/ Voters should read this before casting their ballot. Dianne Prado,Read More former District 1 candidate, exposes the electioneering, intimidation and cronyism of this campaign.
Jim Light April 26, 2013 at 11:16 pm
Perhaps we should just turn our heads and let the City Council violate the law. Is that what youRead More would do Mr H? The City Charter is the law of Redondo. The Council chose knowingly to violate it. When the judge found them in violation, the same Council doubled the costs with a frivolous appeal. This time three judges threw it out. Had the Council followed the Charter, there would be zero costs. If you want to hold anyone accountable, it should be those who cast the vote to violate the City Charter and disenfranchise the voters of Redondo. You should not hold me and the over 200 residents who contributed to the lawsuit to uphold the City Charter responsible for the Council's illegal action.
David Mallen May 6, 2013 at 11:28 pm
We are still waiting for someone -- perhaps the author of this post -- to make a coherent,Read More fact-based argument in favor of Mr. Diels. With all due respect, conclusory hopes and dreams of "reform" will not get 'er done in the face of Mr. Diels' voting record as City Councilman. Thankfully, one good thing has come of the author's blog post. The facts and blog posts have vindicated the honesty and integrity of the campaigns run by Dawn Esser and Chris Cagle, against a baseless attack by Mrs. Diels. If I had a magic mand, I would wave it and change the City Charter so that Dawn and Chris could share the position of Treasurer.
David Mallen May 6, 2013 at 11:17 pm
Mr. Azouz: Thank you. I am glad some neighbors find value in what I do, but more importantly IRead More respect the fact that you take the time to do your own homework. If you have expertise in a particular area that can benefit the City, feel free to contact me off line. That goes for anyone. After the election, I have a "big idea" that I want to promote for our City. When Bill Brand and Steve Aspel both agree that my idea is promising, then I think we are on the right track. I'll be curious to learn what the City Manager has to say.
Rocketgerl May 6, 2013 at 10:51 pm
Correction - that's his email. Jimlightforcouncil.com is more fun! Although I'm sure he'd love toRead More hear from you at either address!
Bryan M_HighlandPark May 5, 2013 at 03:13 am
Good info! I will be attending to see my young nephew in the choir. Glad to know more of theRead More background of the piece!