.
Feedback

Supervisors Approve Marina Dredging

Clean sand dredged from the harbor at Marina del Rey will be used to replenish the Redondo Beach strand.

The Board of Supervisors on Tuesday approved a plan to dredge the harbor at Marina del Rey, move clean sand to Redondo Beach and Dockweiler State Beach, and dump contaminated sediment at a fill site in the Port of Long Beach.

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will manage the dredging project, designed to deepen the marina's north and south entrances.

Since 1999, when the entrance was last dredged, more than 1 million cubic yards of sediment from Ballona Creek and neighboring beaches have caused shoaling at the mouth of the harbor.

The Coast Guard, responsible for homeland security operations and search and rescue, only uses the south channel entrance to get in and out of the marina and avoid accidentally running aground at the shallower, north entrance.

Clean dredged sand, which makes up about one-third of the sediment, will be used to replenish parts of Redondo Beach, which lost sand during storms in 2005, and Dockweiler State Beach. About 75,000 cubic yards of dredged sand will go to Redondo Beach, and 140,000 cubic yards will be dumped offshore of Dockweiler State Beach.

Contaminated dredged material, which could contain toxins related to runoff or heavy metals such as lead, mercury, copper and zinc, will be used as fill material at the Port of Los Angeles' Middle Harbor Redevelopment Project. Under federal law, the dirty material cannot be dumped at sea or on a beach—only at an approved offshore or inland facility.

"The Middle Harbor Redevelopment Project provides an opportunity to safely dispose of dredge materials, while creating much-needed land for a cargo terminal expansion that will support thousands of new jobs," said Richard Steinke, executive director of the Port of Long Beach.

"This is a cost-effective reuse of contaminated sediments that otherwise would need to be hauled off by trucks to remote disposal sites," he said. "Regulatory and wildlife agencies have helped us to approve this sequestering of contaminated sediments in the most environmentally responsible way possible."

Supervisor Don Knabe said the port expansion would generate about 14,000 jobs. He estimated that using Long Beach's approved fill site would save more than $85 million and 42,000 truck trips that would have been required to dispose of the sediment at inland sites.

"This innovative agreement between federal and local agencies is a terrific example of government at all levels working together to solve regional issues,” Knabe said in a news release. "This partnership was a once in a lifetime opportunity and the timing is perfect—Marina del Rey needs to get rid of sediment and Long Beach needs sediment."

Regulatory agencies such as the Environmental Protection Agency, Regional Water Quality Control Board, California Coastal Commission and Department of Fish and Game, as well as environmental groups like Heal the Bay, enthusiastically support the plan, said William Fujioka, the county's chief executive officer.

"The concerns about the least tern nesting season, the grunion spawning season and the brown pelican habitat have all been satisfactorily addressed by the city's project plan," Fujioka said, adding that the Corps of Engineers has secured all necessary regulatory permits.

The county will pay $5.3 million generated by vehicle license fees and set aside to replenish sand at Redondo Beach to fund its half of the project. The Corps of Engineers has agreed to spend $5.4 million, and Long Beach is expected to chip in funding to move an additional 100,000 cubic yards of material.

The funds identified will cover the cost of dredging and moving only about half of the sediment. The project is expected to begin in January and to take about nine months to complete.

The only downside, Fujioka said, will be the inconvenience to boaters and residents during the dredging.

According to the news release from Knabe's office, officials expect the project to start in January and hope to complete it by September 2012.

City News Service contributed to this report.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Redondo Beach Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jeff & Melissa Ginsburg, Steve Aspel and Joan Irvine at our May 14th Election Watch Party
Joan Irvine May 16, 2013 at 08:08 am
Jeff, I am so pleased that you will be representing the residents of District 1 for the next fourRead More years.
john May 4, 2013 at 09:18 pm
And here I thought I needed to Drive to San Diego to experience craft breweries and bars. Nice job.
sheri patterson April 30, 2013 at 12:19 am
Mary, I read your posts throughout the Measure A campaign. You may want to re-read your posts whenRead More you cast stones about "dividing a city". There wasn't much substantiation to any of your posts-- mostly just attacks on Jim Light. Do Aspel and Ginsburg condone this sort of behavior since you are such a strong voice for them?
Jim Light April 28, 2013 at 03:41 pm
http://www.prado2013.com/ Voters should read this before casting their ballot. Dianne Prado,Read More former District 1 candidate, exposes the electioneering, intimidation and cronyism of this campaign.
Jim Light April 26, 2013 at 11:16 pm
Perhaps we should just turn our heads and let the City Council violate the law. Is that what youRead More would do Mr H? The City Charter is the law of Redondo. The Council chose knowingly to violate it. When the judge found them in violation, the same Council doubled the costs with a frivolous appeal. This time three judges threw it out. Had the Council followed the Charter, there would be zero costs. If you want to hold anyone accountable, it should be those who cast the vote to violate the City Charter and disenfranchise the voters of Redondo. You should not hold me and the over 200 residents who contributed to the lawsuit to uphold the City Charter responsible for the Council's illegal action.
David Mallen May 6, 2013 at 11:28 pm
We are still waiting for someone -- perhaps the author of this post -- to make a coherent,Read More fact-based argument in favor of Mr. Diels. With all due respect, conclusory hopes and dreams of "reform" will not get 'er done in the face of Mr. Diels' voting record as City Councilman. Thankfully, one good thing has come of the author's blog post. The facts and blog posts have vindicated the honesty and integrity of the campaigns run by Dawn Esser and Chris Cagle, against a baseless attack by Mrs. Diels. If I had a magic mand, I would wave it and change the City Charter so that Dawn and Chris could share the position of Treasurer.
David Mallen May 6, 2013 at 11:17 pm
Mr. Azouz: Thank you. I am glad some neighbors find value in what I do, but more importantly IRead More respect the fact that you take the time to do your own homework. If you have expertise in a particular area that can benefit the City, feel free to contact me off line. That goes for anyone. After the election, I have a "big idea" that I want to promote for our City. When Bill Brand and Steve Aspel both agree that my idea is promising, then I think we are on the right track. I'll be curious to learn what the City Manager has to say.
Rocketgerl May 6, 2013 at 10:51 pm
Correction - that's his email. Jimlightforcouncil.com is more fun! Although I'm sure he'd love toRead More hear from you at either address!
Rob April 29, 2013 at 03:17 am
ANYONE who will vote in Redondo Beach election MUST read the link below written by Dianne Prado.Read More Jim Light is the right person for District #1! http://www.prado2013.com/the-dirty-down-low-of-redondo-beach-politics/
Joan Irvine April 22, 2013 at 01:13 pm
Hi Rob! I of course respect you have your own opinions but I think you may want to check about theRead More facts. You can clarify this with Kim Fine directly rather than taking my word for it; her contact information is available on her campaign website: http://www.kimberlyfine.com. I'd appreciate if you would post her response, so everyone will have the correct information. Thanks
Joan Irvine April 22, 2013 at 11:00 am
Mary, I agree with your statement: 'While everyone has a right to their own opinion, all in DistrictRead More One should investigate both candidates recent and past history." And anyone who know that Jeff Ginsburg is my choice for this Council seat.