.

Sierra Club Endorses Measure A

Measure A, which will appear on the March ballot, aims to rezone the AES property on Harbor Drive to a mixture of open space, commercial and institutional uses.

The Sierra Club has endorsed Redondo Beach’s Measure A, formerly known as the Power Plant Phase-Out Initiative, the organization announced in its January-February 2013 newsletter.

If it passes, Measure A would rezone the AES property on Harbor Drive to a mixture of 30-40 percent commercial and institutional use. The remaining land would be designated parkland and open space.

By rezoning the land, anti-power-plant activists hope that the California Energy Commission will deny AES its application to repower due to local opposition.

It’s always been a goal of the Sierra Club to turn the property into parkland or open space, said Al Sattler, head of the local Sierra Club group.

The current AES Redondo Beach power plant uses once-through cooling, where ocean water is pumped in to cool the superheated steam that spins the turbines to create electricity. State regulations on once-through cooling plants mandate that the current plant be retired, repowered (rebuilt) or retrofitted to no longer use once-through cooling.

“The old power plant must be shut down because it has been sucking in ocean water for cooling, and killing marine life by cooking it,” the Sierra Club said in the newsletter.

In November, AES Southland filed an application with the California Energy Commission to repower the aging power plant along Harbor Drive. AES says the new AES Redondo Beach will be a “smaller, cleaner, quieter modern plant” that will bridge the gap when electricity from renewable sources is not available.

Opponents from the NoPowerPlant.com political action committee, which spearheaded the push to put Measure A on the ballot, disagree. They say that even though the new plant will run cleaner, AES wants it to run more often, and thus it will produce more particulate pollution annually than the current plant. Additionally, opponents say that a new plant would continue to depress property values and economic growth in the area.

In discussing the Sierra Club’s decision to endorse Measure A, Sattler pointed to a Redondo Beach City Council meeting in 2012 where a representative from the California Independent Systems Operator said there was enough excess capacity in the near future to retire permanently one of the once-through cooling plants in the area.

Sattler also pointed out that increased air pollution and additional investment in fossil fuels would divert money from green technologies, a backwards step from where alternative energy proponents are headed. 

“Fossil fuels are not the future for energy, especially in California,” said Redondo Beach City Councilman Bill Brand, who co-wrote Measure A. “Ultimately, AES Redondo wants to build the power plant to maximize AES profits, and the power plant won’t maximize Redondo Beach revenue.”

Representatives from AES Southland did not return requests for comment.

Jim January 04, 2013 at 04:23 AM
Is there a mayoral candidate who endorses measure A?
Daniel January 04, 2013 at 05:08 AM
Yeah! I am so looking forward to a better neighborhood already!
sheri patterson January 04, 2013 at 06:32 AM
At this time Jim, there is not a Mayoral Candidate that endorses Measure A. It's very unfortunate that we have no great choice for Mayor. We're looking for leadership but there isn't much to choose from. Important to note that Mayoral Candidate Matt Kilroy, authored incredibly dishonest statements on the City's Measure A opposition argument and rebuttal. It's a defining moment for residents for those that are paying attention. If residents do just a tiny bit of homework, they can quickly identify the lies. After 2 yrs of trying to get the City to explore and quantify the health impacts to the community and the significant loss in revenue due to the power plant's location on our waterfront and no action by the council, residents formed a Citizen-led group called NoPowerPlant.com-- Click "videos" on our website to view the public input meetings that the residents held. Kilroy wrote on the ballot argument that we never had any public meetings. It's laughable. There were 3 meetings & we announced them at council mtgs and on Facebook in advance. For Matt Kilroy & others to write such inaccuracies is quite disturbing. These falsehoods will be printed on every ballot booklet mailed to voters. (Nicole M w/ Patch attended the 1st mtg at the Crowne Plaza if I remember correctly.) Pat Aust pushed hard to put the issue before the voters which is great. Gin vetoed that decision unfortunately. I give Aust credit for doing at least that. He is running for Mayor.
Kelly Sarkisian January 04, 2013 at 07:54 AM
There are no candidates for mayor that support the measure because they have the most information regarding the issue. They all know what it could do to the city. This measure could break the city with litigation if it is passed. It's a throw out the baby with the bath water issue. The plant may be gone, the city will be bankrupt and the short list of people that did it will be the few fervent BBR supporters.
Fred Reardon January 04, 2013 at 09:30 AM
I love the Sierra Club even more now! This is yet another example of a remarkable organization and group of people that get it. If one of these candidates for RB Mayor came out in support of Measure A, they would surely win the election. My bet is on Pat Aust. After all, he wanted a vote on this matter? I can't imagine why he would want to "shore up," his competitor, Councilman Aspel's weird argument that the California Initiative Process is wrong. Councilman Aust also led the effort to synchronize the traffic lights on PCH, thus reducing pollution. He is also in support of stopping smoking on the pier. I believe he supported our South Bay Anti Smoking Coalition efforts to ban smoking on Redondo Beach and in RB Parks? Therefore, I hope he breaks ranks and envisions that people would support his candidacy if he supported Measure A and formed a strong vocal stance against this new power plant. He would certainly be under less scrutiny opposing the new plant as a candidate. An advisor, in his campaign, should let him know that, with this platform, he could win the election.
Fred Reardon January 04, 2013 at 09:32 AM
I love Kelly...for her passion. I wish the the best for her and hope all this polluted karma she is putting out doesn't come full circle. If given the choice (and I don't think AES has a legal leg to stand on) I choose litigation over toxic chemicals being floated into my family's lungs. I empathize with Kelly's fears related to being sued. However, this issue is bigger than raising someone's taxes for a swing set. It's about a threat to the health and safety of our families. Therefore, I am confident that the brave citizens of Redondo Beach will stand together, poised, ready to react and utilize whatever legal means necessary to stop this toxic threat. The majority of people I talk to are saying "bring it on...we are not buying all of this misinformation and we are not intimidated by these scare tactics." They are going to vote Yes on Measure A...with a vengeance.
Jim Light January 04, 2013 at 02:31 PM
Kelly, If the measure passes this is way more than BBR. It is the the NoPowerPlant.com group. It is the over 100 volunteers who gave up their summer to collect signatures that qualified Measure A for the ballot. It is the 7500 voters who signed the petitions. And it will be voting majority of Redondo who would have voted Yes on Measure A. As to the candidates who don't support A. It should be of no surprise. All three of them were steadfastly for the Heart of the City, which would have added zoning for 3000 condos at the power plant site while still allowing a power plant to operate. All three were opposed to Measure DD, which passed and gives all Redondo voters a say in major zoning changes passed by the City. All three voted to illegally ignore the City Charter in putting a major zoning change on the ballot. So Kelly, the postion of the three candidates for Council should be no surprise. They have consistently voted for development over resident quality of life their whole political careers. Please show us your analysis that shows the city will go bankrupt if Measure A is passed. You've said it a lot, but you've never supported it with a cogent supported argument. It's not "throw the baby out with the bathwater". It is "do we want industrial blight on our waterfront for 50 years or not?" This is a once in a lifetime opportunity. With the power not needed and all the negative community impacts, Yes on A is a no brainer.
Diane Naletich January 04, 2013 at 03:10 PM
Hats off to the Sierra Club for their support of this critical issue that is coming up for vote. If you are still on the fence regarding how to vote, please read the data on how this plant affects our city as well as surrounding areas. If you truly care about the health of children, you will take time to read the scientific facts.
sheri patterson January 04, 2013 at 06:19 PM
"There are no candidates for mayor that support the measure because they have the most information regarding the issue." ARE YOU KIDDING ME? Kelly, your statements are so off-base and so factually incorrect. You seem to be on a "smear campaign" and are being a mouthpiece for AES and The Chamber (both with obviously huge financial conflicts of interest that are intentionally deceiving the public). And yes, both pushed very hard for Heart of the City as well as Gin, Kilroy and Aspel. The majority of Redondo was outraged over the Heart of the City issue. Jim Light helped bring the facts to the public about the flawed traffic and environmental impact studies that the planning commission voted unanimously to approve (knowing someone cooked the books). But thousands of residents helped STOP Heart of the City, far more significant than BBR and Jim LIght. Jim has used his expertise in these areas to help stop disastrous projects from ruining our City. The issue before us is about truth. Measure A is legal. That is why in 2004 City Staff did extensive legal research and put forth a legal guideline on how to phase out industrial use on our waterfront. Measure A has a strong legal foundation following City Staff recommendations. Thousands of residents, former councilmen, attorney residents and 2-term Redondo Mayor Barbara Doerr 100% support it. In fact, former Mayor Doerr said she STRONGLY supports this Measure.
John Kennedy January 05, 2013 at 11:58 PM
Say no to the lies and vote "no" on A !!
Jim Light January 06, 2013 at 01:37 AM
Nice well supported position, John.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something