.
Feedback

Blog: Need for Helicopter Noise Relief

Citizens should support Bills in Congress to direct the FAA to regulate helicopter flights in Los Angeles County to reduce noise.

Recent news stories have focused on two bills just introduced in Congress aimed at reducing helicopter noise in Los Angeles County. The bills, one in the Senate (S. 208) and one in the House of Representatives (H.R. 456), would direct the Federal Aviation Administration to issue regulations governing helicopter flight altitudes.

Most of the media attention has focused on noise in the San Fernando Valley and West Los Angeles. However, helicopter noise is a big problem in the South Bay. Torrance Airport has changed in recent years. Now, a high percentage of its flights are helicopters. The public was never given any notice before helicopter routes were established over their neighborhoods or before Robinson Helicopter, based at Torrance Airport, was allowed to expand and increase its test and training flights without any consideration being given to mitigating their environmental impacts.  

Now, the South Bay has tens of thousands of helicopter flights each year over otherwise quiet residential areas. They disrupt the quality of our lives and raise safety concerns.

Over three years ago, citizens submitted a petition to the Torrance City Council asking for help in reducing helicopter noise associated with their Airport. Since then, at least 15 public meetings have been held to discuss the problem, but no changes have been made. In June 2012, representatives of the Federal Aviation Administration made an offer to the City of Torrance to test better arrival/departure routes for helicopters. But, it has been over seven months and there has been no response from the City.

The Federal Aviation Administration does not regulate helicopter flight altitudes like they do fixed wing planes, which are required to fly at least 1000 feet above ground level.  Instead, helicopter pilots fly as low as they want.  For noise abatement, the FAA “advises” pilots to fly 2000 feet or more above ground level when flying over noise sensitive residential areas. However, since it’s only “advisory,” pilots don’t have to comply—and they don’t. 

The helicopter industry’s own noise abatement program suggests that pilots “fly higher” to reduce noise on the ground. But, again, it’s voluntary, and it’s largely ignored by pilots.

Helicopters cast a wide noise footprint. A single helicopter flight from Torrance Airport around the Palos Verdes Peninsula coastline and back to the airport (a distance of about 25 miles) can negatively impact many hundreds of households on the ground. Moreover, it’s not uncommon for there to be as many as 20-25 such flights in a single day.  

Last year seven South Bay city councils—including Redondo Beach, Hermosa Beach, Palos Verdes Estates, Rancho Palos Verdes, Rolling Hills Estates, Lomita, and Los Angeles—voted to support federal legislation to reduce helicopter noise. The County Board of Supervisors, the State Senate, and the State Assembly also voted to support it.

It’s time for the Federal Aviation Administration to require minimum flight altitudes for helicopters. That’s what the proposed Congressional Bills ask the FAA to do and it makes sense. 

Citizens should contact members of Congress to let them know they support these Bills. If you want more information, updates, or to find out what you can do to help, contact Citizens for Quiet Helicopters at helicopternoise.com.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Redondo Beach Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jeff & Melissa Ginsburg, Steve Aspel and Joan Irvine at our May 14th Election Watch Party
Deborah Shepard May 18, 2013 at 11:32 am
Big congrats to you Jeff. Please fill us in (Crowne Plaza Redondo Beach and Marina Hotel andRead More Visitors Bureau) on the hotel shuttle. Also, how do we get Riviera Village's newest hit, Rock N Brew to be called Redondo Beach vs. Torrance??
Joan Irvine May 16, 2013 at 08:08 am
Jeff, I am so pleased that you will be representing the residents of District 1 for the next fourRead More years.
Deborah Shepard May 18, 2013 at 11:56 am
Congrats to the boys and girls baseball/softball teams, showing the Redondo strength of body andRead More mind! Reading all sorts of good things about your teams! Great going players and coaches from the Crowne Plaza Redondo Beach and Marina Hotel staff!
john May 4, 2013 at 09:18 pm
And here I thought I needed to Drive to San Diego to experience craft breweries and bars. Nice job.
sheri patterson April 30, 2013 at 12:19 am
Mary, I read your posts throughout the Measure A campaign. You may want to re-read your posts whenRead More you cast stones about "dividing a city". There wasn't much substantiation to any of your posts-- mostly just attacks on Jim Light. Do Aspel and Ginsburg condone this sort of behavior since you are such a strong voice for them?
Jim Light April 28, 2013 at 03:41 pm
http://www.prado2013.com/ Voters should read this before casting their ballot. Dianne Prado,Read More former District 1 candidate, exposes the electioneering, intimidation and cronyism of this campaign.
Jim Light April 26, 2013 at 11:16 pm
Perhaps we should just turn our heads and let the City Council violate the law. Is that what youRead More would do Mr H? The City Charter is the law of Redondo. The Council chose knowingly to violate it. When the judge found them in violation, the same Council doubled the costs with a frivolous appeal. This time three judges threw it out. Had the Council followed the Charter, there would be zero costs. If you want to hold anyone accountable, it should be those who cast the vote to violate the City Charter and disenfranchise the voters of Redondo. You should not hold me and the over 200 residents who contributed to the lawsuit to uphold the City Charter responsible for the Council's illegal action.
David Mallen May 6, 2013 at 11:28 pm
We are still waiting for someone -- perhaps the author of this post -- to make a coherent,Read More fact-based argument in favor of Mr. Diels. With all due respect, conclusory hopes and dreams of "reform" will not get 'er done in the face of Mr. Diels' voting record as City Councilman. Thankfully, one good thing has come of the author's blog post. The facts and blog posts have vindicated the honesty and integrity of the campaigns run by Dawn Esser and Chris Cagle, against a baseless attack by Mrs. Diels. If I had a magic mand, I would wave it and change the City Charter so that Dawn and Chris could share the position of Treasurer.
David Mallen May 6, 2013 at 11:17 pm
Mr. Azouz: Thank you. I am glad some neighbors find value in what I do, but more importantly IRead More respect the fact that you take the time to do your own homework. If you have expertise in a particular area that can benefit the City, feel free to contact me off line. That goes for anyone. After the election, I have a "big idea" that I want to promote for our City. When Bill Brand and Steve Aspel both agree that my idea is promising, then I think we are on the right track. I'll be curious to learn what the City Manager has to say.
Rocketgerl May 6, 2013 at 10:51 pm
Correction - that's his email. Jimlightforcouncil.com is more fun! Although I'm sure he'd love toRead More hear from you at either address!